Talk:Elemental Weakness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Kaseki |
>Vinifera7 (→Sic in version 3.12.0?: new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I thought GGG removed the Elemental Weakness skill gem and replaced it with the three individual element curse gems? [[User:Torinir|Torinir]] ([[User talk:Torinir|talk]]) 22:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC) | I thought GGG removed the Elemental Weakness skill gem and replaced it with the three individual element curse gems? [[User:Torinir|Torinir]] ([[User talk:Torinir|talk]]) 22:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Yes, it's still available. It's a drop-only gem now. They didn't remove it from the game, just from quest rewards. [[User:Danny|Danny]] ([[User talk:Danny|talk]]) 23:59, 12 February 2013 (UTC) | :Yes, it's still available. It's a drop-only gem now. They didn't remove it from the game, just from quest rewards. [[User:Danny|Danny]] ([[User talk:Danny|talk]]) 23:59, 12 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Sic in version 3.12.0? == | |||
What's the reason for adding {{tl|sic}} to the [[version 3.12.0]] changes? As far as I can tell, there is nothing that looks as if it might be an error of transcription in the text immediately preceding the "[sic]" notation. Please refer to the Wikipedia article for ''[[wikipedia:sic|sic]]'' for information about how {{tl|sic}} is meant to be used. —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User_talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 05:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:22, 1 January 2021
Is Elemental Weakness still available to players?
I thought GGG removed the Elemental Weakness skill gem and replaced it with the three individual element curse gems? Torinir (talk) 22:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, it's still available. It's a drop-only gem now. They didn't remove it from the game, just from quest rewards. Danny (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Sic in version 3.12.0?
What's the reason for adding {{sic}} to the version 3.12.0 changes? As far as I can tell, there is nothing that looks as if it might be an error of transcription in the text immediately preceding the "[sic]" notation. Please refer to the Wikipedia article for sic for information about how {{sic}} is meant to be used. —Vini (t|c) 05:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)