Talk:Two-Toned Boots
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This talk page is for discussing the article Two-Toned Boots.
- Sign your posts using four tildes (
~~~~) - Start a new topic at the bottom under a
==level 2 heading== - Indent replies using colons (
:) - Keep it civil
- Assume good faith
- Don't remove past discussions
Title format
Two-Stone Ring uses the name of the elemental rings to separate them. Maybe these boots should too for consistency?--Illviljan (talk) 07:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not really no. Two-Stone Rings actually have the same stones as the rings they're named after, whereas Two-Toned Boots have no have discernible stones whatsoever. In fact they appear somewhat scaly. Personally, I think both the rings and boots should be changed to simply "fire and lightning", "fire and cold", and "cold and lightning".--Connor (Talk | contribs) 07:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I was going to argue that they're ruby colored. But when googling a bit it turns out these stones can have almost any color anyway... I don't mind using the resistances, I just want them to use the same naming style.--Illviljan (talk) 07:39, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- That's an interesting suggestion, Connor. I think it's fine the way it is, but let's think about whether a naming change is warranted. —Vini (t|c) 01:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Honestly, I think naming by what they do rather then what they look like makes much more sense. I think we should change those pages to the "fire and lightning resistance" etc in the parenthesises --OmegaK2 (t|c) 02:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)