Talk:The Hungry Loop: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→List of support gems in item box: new section) |
>Illviljan No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Do we really need to include a list of all support gems in the item box? —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 20:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC) | Do we really need to include a list of all support gems in the item box? —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 20:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
: If we want the item to be picked up by all our various item tables we do. The list is supposed to be collapsed anyway so it ''shouldn't'' be a problem. Could look a little better though with the text being centered and a little less intrusive <nowiki>[Expand]</nowiki>-button I suppose. There's some risk in hitting the template size limits on other query pages but I think it's worth it, as otherwise we have to add them manually to our query tables which kind of defeats the purpose of them. --[[User:Illviljan|Illviljan]] ([[User talk:Illviljan|talk]]) 04:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:49, 13 March 2020
List of support gems in item box
Do we really need to include a list of all support gems in the item box? —Vini (t|c) 20:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- If we want the item to be picked up by all our various item tables we do. The list is supposed to be collapsed anyway so it shouldn't be a problem. Could look a little better though with the text being centered and a little less intrusive [Expand]-button I suppose. There's some risk in hitting the template size limits on other query pages but I think it's worth it, as otherwise we have to add them manually to our query tables which kind of defeats the purpose of them. --Illviljan (talk) 04:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)