Talk:Drop-restricted item: Difference between revisions
>Vinifera7 m (Vinifera7 moved page Talk:Trade-Only Items to Talk:Drop-restricted item without leaving a redirect) |
m (Vinifera7 moved page Talk:Trade-Only Items to Talk:Drop-restricted item without leaving a redirect) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 06:08, 26 August 2014
Legacy version table
Does anyone have an idea about how to add Rainbowstride's second legacy version without messing up the table? - Climmels (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- I would just add a new line. Then maybe merge the cells on the last column. I'm not sure to understand what you consider "messed up"? Chriskang (talk) 13:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've just added in some rowspans to the Rainbowstride sections. Working in email marketing has the occasional benefit, HTML table mastery being one of the few. Iamacyborg (talk) 18:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Suggestion
I don't think we should list uniques with no stats changed except their implicits. It should IMO be enough to list the base item and skip the redundancy of listing the unique as well (Example: Astramentis). I cannot think of any instance where these changes are significant to the use of the unique except maybe Astramentis (where the idea is to stack stats) and Thief's Torment (the slightly less res may be more impactful when you can't use a second ring, but that's a stretch tbh). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses (talk • contribs) 10:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)