Talk:Drop-restricted item: Difference between revisions
m (Vinifera7 moved page Talk:Trade-Only Items to Talk:Drop-restricted item without leaving a redirect) |
>KLIKS (→Seperate page for Legacy Items: new section) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I don't think we should list uniques with no stats changed except their implicits. It should IMO be enough to list the base item and skip the redundancy of listing the unique as well (Example: Astramentis). I cannot think of any instance where these changes are significant to the use of the unique except maybe Astramentis (where the idea is to stack stats) and Thief's Torment (the slightly less res may be more impactful when you can't use a second ring, but that's a stretch tbh). <small>—The preceding [[Help:Signatures|unsigned comment]] was added by [[User:TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses|TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses]] ([[User talk:TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses|contribs]]) 10:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | I don't think we should list uniques with no stats changed except their implicits. It should IMO be enough to list the base item and skip the redundancy of listing the unique as well (Example: Astramentis). I cannot think of any instance where these changes are significant to the use of the unique except maybe Astramentis (where the idea is to stack stats) and Thief's Torment (the slightly less res may be more impactful when you can't use a second ring, but that's a stretch tbh). <small>—The preceding [[Help:Signatures|unsigned comment]] was added by [[User:TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses|TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses]] ([[User talk:TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses|contribs]]) 10:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
: The purpose of doing so is to have a complete list of unique items with legacy variants. —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 14:16, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | : The purpose of doing so is to have a complete list of unique items with legacy variants. —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 14:16, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Seperate page for Legacy Items == | |||
I think we should go back to a seperate page for legacy item, since The Awakening will introduce at least 50 new ones on top of the already high number. This will also help in managing the template cap on this page (which we are almost hitting, I think?). --[[User:Climmels|Climmels aka SirProblematique]] ([[User talk:Climmels|talk]]) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:30, 2 July 2015
Legacy version table
Does anyone have an idea about how to add Rainbowstride's second legacy version without messing up the table? - Climmels (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- I would just add a new line. Then maybe merge the cells on the last column. I'm not sure to understand what you consider "messed up"? Chriskang (talk) 13:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've just added in some rowspans to the Rainbowstride sections. Working in email marketing has the occasional benefit, HTML table mastery being one of the few. Iamacyborg (talk) 18:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Suggestion
I don't think we should list uniques with no stats changed except their implicits. It should IMO be enough to list the base item and skip the redundancy of listing the unique as well (Example: Astramentis). I cannot think of any instance where these changes are significant to the use of the unique except maybe Astramentis (where the idea is to stack stats) and Thief's Torment (the slightly less res may be more impactful when you can't use a second ring, but that's a stretch tbh). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheOneTheOnlyTheMoses (talk • contribs) 10:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- The purpose of doing so is to have a complete list of unique items with legacy variants. —Vini (t|c) 14:16, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Seperate page for Legacy Items
I think we should go back to a seperate page for legacy item, since The Awakening will introduce at least 50 new ones on top of the already high number. This will also help in managing the template cap on this page (which we are almost hitting, I think?). --Climmels aka SirProblematique (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC)