Talk:Hypothermia Support: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Dndmpdju9kvo4fwpxn5 (→Marauder: new section) |
>Dndmpdju9kvo4fwpxn5 mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
My Marauder character has just bought a Hypothermia gem from Siosa in Act 3.<br> | My Marauder character has just bought a Hypothermia gem from Siosa in Act 3.<br> | ||
(In this page in the Vendor reward table there is a red X below marauder at the Act3 row.)<br> | (In this page in the Vendor reward table there is a red X below marauder at the Act3 row.)<br> | ||
[[User:Dndmpdju9kvo4fwpxn5| | [[User:Dndmpdju9kvo4fwpxn5|Dndm]] | ||
Revision as of 14:48, 22 April 2020
"Only subsequent hits will receive the damage bonus"
Why must any hit receive the damage bonus?
Does this support cause chill or not? If not, then it is possible that the enemy will not be chilled. Not only for one hit, but forever. Remains unchilled. So neither of the hits will receive the damage bonus.
- The support doesn't cause chill, the cold damage does. If the enemy is chilled when hit, the hit and the ailments it applies will do more damage. If not, it will not. --RenegadeKamui (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Gem Vendor
Shouldn't the NPC for buying this gem be Siosa rather than Clarissa?
Marauder
My Marauder character has just bought a Hypothermia gem from Siosa in Act 3.
(In this page in the Vendor reward table there is a red X below marauder at the Act3 row.)
Dndm