Talk:Cold to Fire Support: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Malice1574@legacy41644011 |
>Njb013-gpuser |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:I just wrote an article explaining [[Damage conversion]], take a look, it should answer your question. — [[User:Malice|Malice]] ([[User_talk:Malice|talk]]) 02:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | :I just wrote an article explaining [[Damage conversion]], take a look, it should answer your question. — [[User:Malice|Malice]] ([[User_talk:Malice|talk]]) 02:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Version history incomplete == | |||
I don't know how to look it up myself, but the last version edit listed shows the quality being reduced to .35% from .7%, whereas it is currently set at .5%. If someone could find that out and fix that entry that would be great. | |||
-[[User:NinjaNick95|NinjaNick95]] ([[User talk:NinjaNick95|talk]]) 22:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:18, 29 June 2013
How is damage calculated when...?
So, say you have Glacial Hammer with Cold to Fire.
| Original Damage | 100 Physical |
| +Glacial Hammer(level 1) | 50 Physical + 50 Cold |
| +Cold to Fire(level 1) | 50 Physical + 30 Cold + 20 Fire |
How would +100% Cold and Fire damage from passives be applied?
- 50 Physical + (2 * (30 Cold + 2*20 Fire)) = 50P + 60C + 80F
- 50 Physical + (2*30 Cold) + (2*20 Fire) = 50P + 60C + 40F
- something else?
-AnnanFay (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I just wrote an article explaining Damage conversion, take a look, it should answer your question. — Malice (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Version history incomplete
I don't know how to look it up myself, but the last version edit listed shows the quality being reduced to .35% from .7%, whereas it is currently set at .5%. If someone could find that out and fix that entry that would be great. -NinjaNick95 (talk) 22:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)