Talk:Build of the Week archive: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Iamacyborg (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Agreed. We could call it "Main Passives". —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 12:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC) | : Agreed. We could call it "Main Passives". —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 12:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
:: Yup, I was going to suggest "Noteworthy Passives", but that might cause too much confusion with the Notable Passive nomenclature. [[User:Iamacyborg|Iamacyborg]] ([[User talk:Iamacyborg|talk]]) 15:19, 3 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:19, 3 August 2014
Not all keystone passives listed are really keystones (suggesting rename of the column)
I don't want to nitpick, but Adder's Touch isn't a keystone passive. There are more passives that aren't keystones, but have significant effect on the game and can be essential to builds, like Volatile Mines (instant detonation), Leather and Steel (no movement penalty from armour), Bullying (wand knockback on crit), Mind Drinker (free mana leech) or Clever Construction (traps and mines can't be damaged initially). How about renaming the Keystone Passive column to Key Passives or Essential Passives? --DarkUnknown
- Yup, I was going to suggest "Noteworthy Passives", but that might cause too much confusion with the Notable Passive nomenclature. Iamacyborg (talk) 15:19, 3 August 2014 (UTC)