Talk:Arctic Armour: Difference between revisions
>PyRobotic No edit summary |
(→Can I link this spell with "Spell Totem Support" gem?: Link to Help:Signatures in unsigned message.) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Non-gem data in gem data table == | |||
I'm unsure if a consensus as been reached regarding non-gem data in gem data tables. I've removed the extra columns for now, it makes it much easier for me to verify the gem data. --[[User:Nightblade|Nightblade]] ([[User talk:Nightblade|talk]]) 02:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | I'm unsure if a consensus as been reached regarding non-gem data in gem data tables. I've removed the extra columns for now, it makes it much easier for me to verify the gem data. --[[User:Nightblade|Nightblade]] ([[User talk:Nightblade|talk]]) 02:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
After adding level 27 and level 28 data obtained from [http://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/26yco6/level_28_arctic_armour/ this reddit thread], I noticed the base duration values were off (cross checked against a level 17 gem in-game). I also noticed the requirements went up to level 70 in the thread. Since requirements usually increase then cap out at 20, I believe the req. data for levels 20-26 need to be verified as well. [[User:PyRobotic|PyRobotic]] ([[User talk:PyRobotic|talk]]) 14:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | After adding level 27 and level 28 data obtained from [http://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/26yco6/level_28_arctic_armour/ this reddit thread], I noticed the base duration values were off (cross checked against a level 17 gem in-game). I also noticed the requirements went up to level 70 in the thread. Since requirements usually increase then cap out at 20, I believe the req. data for levels 20-26 need to be verified as well. [[User:PyRobotic|PyRobotic]] ([[User talk:PyRobotic|talk]]) 14:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Can I link this spell with "Spell Totem Support" gem? == | |||
Can I link this spell with "Spell Totem Support" gem? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small>—Preceding [[Help:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dndmpdju9kvo4fwpxn5|Dndmpdju9kvo4fwpxn5]] ([[User talk:Dndmpdju9kvo4fwpxn5#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dndmpdju9kvo4fwpxn5|contribs]]) 19:12, 27 November 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
Latest revision as of 15:00, 15 May 2023
Non-gem data in gem data table
I'm unsure if a consensus as been reached regarding non-gem data in gem data tables. I've removed the extra columns for now, it makes it much easier for me to verify the gem data. --Nightblade (talk) 02:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
How does this work with resistance?
100 incoming fire damage. Level 7 Arctic Armour. 75% Fire Resistance.
- (100 - 25) * 25% = 18.75
- (100 * 25%) - 25 = 0
-AnnanFay (talk) 23:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Arctic armour reduces the incoming damage after resistances so the second example is correct. [1] - Ezhiel (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Base Duration values & Level Req.
After adding level 27 and level 28 data obtained from this reddit thread, I noticed the base duration values were off (cross checked against a level 17 gem in-game). I also noticed the requirements went up to level 70 in the thread. Since requirements usually increase then cap out at 20, I believe the req. data for levels 20-26 need to be verified as well. PyRobotic (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Can I link this spell with "Spell Totem Support" gem?
Can I link this spell with "Spell Totem Support" gem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dndmpdju9kvo4fwpxn5 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 27 November 2019 (UTC)