Talk:Two-Toned Boots: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Illviljan (Created page with "==Title format== Two-Stone Ring uses the name of the elemental rings to separate them. Maybe these boots should too for consistency?--~~~~") |
>94Connor949-gpuser |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Title format== | ==Title format== | ||
[[Two-Stone Ring]] uses the name of the elemental rings to separate them. Maybe these boots should too for consistency?--[[User:Illviljan|Illviljan]] ([[User talk:Illviljan|talk]]) 07:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | [[Two-Stone Ring]] uses the name of the elemental rings to separate them. Maybe these boots should too for consistency?--[[User:Illviljan|Illviljan]] ([[User talk:Illviljan|talk]]) 07:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Not really no. Two-''Stone'' Rings actually have the same stones as the rings they're named after, whereas Two-''Toned'' Boots have no have discernible stones whatsoever. In fact they appear somewhat scaly. Personally, I think both the rings and boots should be changed to simply "fire and lightning", "fire and cold", and "cold and lightning".--[[User:94Connor949|Connor]] ([[User talk:94Connor949|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/94Connor949|contribs]]) 07:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:25, 18 August 2016
Title format
Two-Stone Ring uses the name of the elemental rings to separate them. Maybe these boots should too for consistency?--Illviljan (talk) 07:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not really no. Two-Stone Rings actually have the same stones as the rings they're named after, whereas Two-Toned Boots have no have discernible stones whatsoever. In fact they appear somewhat scaly. Personally, I think both the rings and boots should be changed to simply "fire and lightning", "fire and cold", and "cold and lightning".--Connor (Talk | contribs) 07:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)