Talk:Damage effectiveness: Difference between revisions
>Raicss No edit summary |
Iamacyborg (talk | contribs) (→Skills) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Yeah, noticed it a few times too, they probably still call it that way internally. Fortunately, ingame terminology has been consistent. [[User:Raicss|Raicss]] ([[User talk:Raicss|talk]]) 15:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | :Yeah, noticed it a few times too, they probably still call it that way internally. Fortunately, ingame terminology has been consistent. [[User:Raicss|Raicss]] ([[User talk:Raicss|talk]]) 15:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
:: Yup, although seeing as they're still basically the same thing, I think it might still be worth including a few lines about melee skills on the page, even if it's just to link to another page that uses the correct terminology. [[User:Iamacyborg|Iamacyborg]] ([[User talk:Iamacyborg|talk]]) 15:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:12, 16 April 2015
Skills
You're definitely right to have reverted my edit. What's confusing is that GGG still call it damage effectiveness when relating to skills in patch notes, like the change to Module Error: Too many skills found with q_where = skill.active_skill_name="Glacial Hammer". Please choose only one of the following ids:
CityStalkerGlacialHammer - 10% chance to Freeze enemies, 50% of Physical Damage Converted to Cold Damage (page)
GlacialHammerRoyale - 10% chance to Freeze enemies, 60% of Physical Damage Converted to Cold Damage, Every third successive strike Freezes enemies as though dealing (100-190)% more Damage, +(0.2-0.3) metres to Melee Strike Range, 35% increased Duration of Cold Ailments, (10-19)% increased Effect of Cold Ailments, Adds (3-20) to (4-30) Cold Damage against Chilled Enemies (page) in Version 1.2.0. Iamacyborg (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, noticed it a few times too, they probably still call it that way internally. Fortunately, ingame terminology has been consistent. Raicss (talk) 15:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yup, although seeing as they're still basically the same thing, I think it might still be worth including a few lines about melee skills on the page, even if it's just to link to another page that uses the correct terminology. Iamacyborg (talk) 15:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)