Talk:Cruelty: Difference between revisions

From Path of Exile Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
E = {5 \over 6} * ({D \over L})^{0.2} * ( 1 + M )
E = {5 \over 6} * ({D \over L})^{0.2} * ( 1 + M )
}} is most certainly not accurate given the [https://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/mr1ijx/ggg_please_explain_cruelty/gujknss/ explanation] of Cruelty from GGG_staff on Reddit. —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 23:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
}} is most certainly not accurate given the [https://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/mr1ijx/ggg_please_explain_cruelty/gujknss/ explanation] of Cruelty from GGG_staff on Reddit. —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 23:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
== The changed formula is accurate ==
The previous version was mistaken due to not accounting for 20% increased effect from the level 20 gem mentioned in that explanation. Adding the coefficient of {{math|display=inline|formula={5 \over 6} }} - or {{math|display=inline|formula={100% \over 120%} }} if you will - matches the formula with the results in the explanation:<br>
{{math|display=inline|formula={5 \over 6} * ({0.01 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 15.8489% }}<br>
{{math|display=inline|formula={5 \over 6} * ({3.2 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 50.2377% }}<br>
or alternatively<br>
{{math|display=inline|formula=50% = {5 \over 6} * ({D \over L})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) \iff }}<br>
{{math|display=inline|formula=50% = ({D \over L})^{0.2} \iff }}<br>
{{math|display=inline|formula=({D \over L}) = ( 50% )^{5} \iff }}<br>
{{math|display=inline|formula=({D \over L}) = 3.125% }}<br>
whereas using the mistaken formula leads to<br>
{{math|display=inline|formula=({0.01 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 19.0187% }} and<br>
{{math|display=inline|formula=({3.2 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 60.2853% }} <br>
which do '''not''' match the values in the Explanation.

Revision as of 05:03, 29 January 2022

Formula seems inaccurate

The formula, is most certainly not accurate given the explanation of Cruelty from GGG_staff on Reddit. —Vini (t|c) 23:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

The changed formula is accurate

The previous version was mistaken due to not accounting for 20% increased effect from the level 20 gem mentioned in that explanation. Adding the coefficient of - or if you will - matches the formula with the results in the explanation:


or alternatively




whereas using the mistaken formula leads to
and

which do not match the values in the Explanation.