Talk:Cold to Fire Support: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Njb013-gpuser |
>OmegaK2 m (OmegaK2 moved page Talk:Cold to Fire to Talk:Cold to Fire Support: Bot: Moved page) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I don't know how to look it up myself, but the last version edit listed shows the quality being reduced to .35% from .7%, whereas it is currently set at .5%. If someone could find that out and fix that entry that would be great. | I don't know how to look it up myself, but the last version edit listed shows the quality being reduced to .35% from .7%, whereas it is currently set at .5%. If someone could find that out and fix that entry that would be great. | ||
-[[User:NinjaNick95|NinjaNick95]] ([[User talk:NinjaNick95|talk]]) 22:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC) | -[[User:NinjaNick95|NinjaNick95]] ([[User talk:NinjaNick95|talk]]) 22:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
: I've searched through every patch note and couldn't find an entry, that's why it's not mentioned. I'll add something to reduce confusion. --[[User:GoliathOffline|GoliathOffline]] ([[User talk:GoliathOffline|talk]]) 08:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 09:53, 26 May 2016
How is damage calculated when...?
So, say you have Glacial Hammer with Cold to Fire.
Original Damage | 100 Physical |
+Glacial Hammer(level 1) | 50 Physical + 50 Cold |
+Cold to Fire(level 1) | 50 Physical + 30 Cold + 20 Fire |
How would +100% Cold and Fire damage from passives be applied?
- 50 Physical + (2 * (30 Cold + 2*20 Fire)) = 50P + 60C + 80F
- 50 Physical + (2*30 Cold) + (2*20 Fire) = 50P + 60C + 40F
- something else?
-AnnanFay (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I just wrote an article explaining Damage conversion, take a look, it should answer your question. — Malice (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Version history incomplete
I don't know how to look it up myself, but the last version edit listed shows the quality being reduced to .35% from .7%, whereas it is currently set at .5%. If someone could find that out and fix that entry that would be great. -NinjaNick95 (talk) 22:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- I've searched through every patch note and couldn't find an entry, that's why it's not mentioned. I'll add something to reduce confusion. --GoliathOffline (talk) 08:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)