|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
| {{math|display=inline|formula=({3.2 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 60.2853% }} <br> | | {{math|display=inline|formula=({3.2 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 60.2853% }} <br> |
| which do '''not''' match the values in the Explanation. | | which do '''not''' match the values in the Explanation. |
| —[[User:Psychomap]] 05:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC) | | —Psychomap 05:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC) |
| | |
| | : I see how you got that now. I didn't account for the increase to Cruelty effect that's on the support gem. Can you fix the article for us? —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 16:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 29 January 2022
Formula seems inaccurate
The formula, is most certainly not accurate given the explanation of Cruelty from GGG_staff on Reddit. —Vini (t|c) 23:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
The changed formula is accurate
The previous version was mistaken due to not accounting for 20% increased effect from the level 20 gem mentioned in that explanation. Adding the coefficient of - or if you will - matches the formula with the results in the explanation:
or alternatively
whereas using the mistaken formula leads to
and
which do not match the values in the Explanation.
—Psychomap 05:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- I see how you got that now. I didn't account for the increase to Cruelty effect that's on the support gem. Can you fix the article for us? —Vini (t|c) 16:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)