Talk:Cruelty: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Formula seems inaccurate: new section) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
E = {5 \over 6} * ({D \over L})^{0.2} * ( 1 + M ) | E = {5 \over 6} * ({D \over L})^{0.2} * ( 1 + M ) | ||
}} is most certainly not accurate given the [https://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/mr1ijx/ggg_please_explain_cruelty/gujknss/ explanation] of Cruelty from GGG_staff on Reddit. —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 23:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC) | }} is most certainly not accurate given the [https://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/mr1ijx/ggg_please_explain_cruelty/gujknss/ explanation] of Cruelty from GGG_staff on Reddit. —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 23:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
== The changed formula is accurate == | |||
The previous version was mistaken due to not accounting for 20% increased effect from the level 20 gem mentioned in that explanation. Adding the coefficient of {{math|display=inline|formula={5 \over 6} }} - or {{math|display=inline|formula={100% \over 120%} }} if you will - matches the formula with the results in the explanation:<br> | |||
{{math|display=inline|formula={5 \over 6} * ({0.01 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 15.8489% }}<br> | |||
{{math|display=inline|formula={5 \over 6} * ({3.2 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 50.2377% }}<br> | |||
or alternatively<br> | |||
{{math|display=inline|formula=50% = {5 \over 6} * ({D \over L})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) \iff }}<br> | |||
{{math|display=inline|formula=50% = ({D \over L})^{0.2} \iff }}<br> | |||
{{math|display=inline|formula=({D \over L}) = ( 50% )^{5} \iff }}<br> | |||
{{math|display=inline|formula=({D \over L}) = 3.125% }}<br> | |||
whereas using the mistaken formula leads to<br> | |||
{{math|display=inline|formula=({0.01 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 19.0187% }} and<br> | |||
{{math|display=inline|formula=({3.2 \over 100})^{0.2} * ( 1 + 20% ) = 60.2853% }} <br> | |||
which do '''not''' match the values in the Explanation. | |||
—Psychomap 05:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
: I see how you got that now. I didn't account for the increase to Cruelty effect that's on the support gem. Can you fix the article for us? —[[User:Vinifera7|Vini]] ([[User talk:Vinifera7|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Vinifera7|c]]) 16:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 29 January 2022
Formula seems inaccurate
The formula, is most certainly not accurate given the explanation of Cruelty from GGG_staff on Reddit. —Vini (t|c) 23:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
The changed formula is accurate
The previous version was mistaken due to not accounting for 20% increased effect from the level 20 gem mentioned in that explanation. Adding the coefficient of - or if you will - matches the formula with the results in the explanation:
or alternatively
whereas using the mistaken formula leads to
and
which do not match the values in the Explanation.
—Psychomap 05:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)