Talk:Summon Raging Spirit: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>TheFrz mNo edit summary |
(→Damage Effectiveness: Link to Help:Signatures in unsigned message.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Damage Effectiveness== | ==Damage Effectiveness== | ||
It lists the damage effectiveness as 70% for calculating anger and wrath damage, but wasn't this changed to 100% in patch 2.1? <small> | It lists the damage effectiveness as 70% for calculating anger and wrath damage, but wasn't this changed to 100% in patch 2.1? <small>—Preceding [[Help:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:OnyxMelon|OnyxMelon]] ([[User talk:OnyxMelon|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OnyxMelon|contribs]]) 04:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
: Yes, the strategy section is outdated. — [[User:TheFrz|TheFrz ]]— 06:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC) | : Yes, the strategy section is outdated. — [[User:TheFrz|TheFrz ]]— 06:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:03, 15 May 2023
Level Progression
I think that the numbers in gem level progression are wrong. They seem to do far more damage and have much more life than written. It is also inconsistent with the description of Empower's effect on it.--DarkUnknown (talk) 17:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- It was the the progression for spirits from (spirit) level to 1-20 by accident. Should be better now. What did you mean with Empower? --OmegaK2 (t|c) 20:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Damage Effectiveness
It lists the damage effectiveness as 70% for calculating anger and wrath damage, but wasn't this changed to 100% in patch 2.1? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OnyxMelon (talk • contribs) 04:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, the strategy section is outdated. — TheFrz — 06:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)