Talk:List of unique axes: Difference between revisions

From Path of Exile Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>Edubkn-gpuser
(Undo revision 332129 by Edubkn (talk))
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
02/08/16 : Dyadus' DPS in the list is currently wrong, because both its elemental bonuses are counted, which isn't possible. It seems like it's an issue coming from the template/item itself. Could anyone fix it? <small>—The preceding [[gphelp:Signatures|unsigned comment]] was added by [[User:Nephophobic|Nephophobic]] ([[User talk:Nephophobic|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nephophobic|contribs]]) 20:05, 2 August 2016‎ (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
== Dyadus' DPS ==
02/08/16 : Dyadus' DPS in the list is currently wrong, because both its elemental bonuses are counted, which isn't possible. It seems like it's an issue coming from the template/item itself. Could anyone fix it? <small>—Preceding [[Help:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nephophobic|Nephophobic]] ([[User talk:Nephophobic|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nephophobic|contribs]]) 20:05, 2 August 2016‎ (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
 
Dyadus' DPS is now wrong though, because it doesn't account any of the elemental damages. Since the values are the same, it could take into account either one of them.<small>—Preceding [[Help:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Edubkn|Edubkn]] ([[User talk:Edubkn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Edubkn|contribs]]) 01:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

Latest revision as of 15:02, 15 May 2023

Dyadus' DPS

02/08/16 : Dyadus' DPS in the list is currently wrong, because both its elemental bonuses are counted, which isn't possible. It seems like it's an issue coming from the template/item itself. Could anyone fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nephophobic (talkcontribs) 20:05, 2 August 2016‎ (UTC)

Dyadus' DPS is now wrong though, because it doesn't account any of the elemental damages. Since the values are the same, it could take into account either one of them.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Edubkn (talkcontribs) 01:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)