Template talk:Item infobox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Malice1574@legacy41644011 (→Complexity: new section) |
>FaceLicker329@legacy41643848 m (→Item Template) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::: Oooh, I can't wait! :) (I think wowpedia's js uses ajax btw.) --[[User:Nightblade|Nightblade]] ([[User talk:Nightblade|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC) | ::: Oooh, I can't wait! :) (I think wowpedia's js uses ajax btw.) --[[User:Nightblade|Nightblade]] ([[User talk:Nightblade|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::Yeah, I worked the [[Template:Item]] a while back. No one ever used it though and most people, like you Malice, didn't know it existed. Where the hell were you Malice when we needed you months ago?! O well, your new template looks great now! See it in use: [[Unique_Swords]]. How do I center the template within the column?--[[User:FaceLicker|FaceLicker]] ([[User talk:FaceLicker|talk]]) 17:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Complexity == | == Complexity == |
Revision as of 17:55, 11 February 2013
Item Template
With this awesome template done, I'm guessing we can now scrap Template:Item. Iamacyborg (talk) 16:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- I agree, great looking template! Now all we need is for someone to implement the js they use over on [wowpedia] to make mouse-hover links work in the wiki. [example] -- Nightblade (talk) 00:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oh wow, I didn't know Template:Item existed, someone has put a lot of work into that. Seems a shame to just discard it. It is outdated though since the game had a UI overhaul.
- Oooh, I can't wait! :) (I think wowpedia's js uses ajax btw.) --Nightblade (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I worked the Template:Item a while back. No one ever used it though and most people, like you Malice, didn't know it existed. Where the hell were you Malice when we needed you months ago?! O well, your new template looks great now! See it in use: Unique_Swords. How do I center the template within the column?--FaceLicker (talk) 17:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Complexity
Template:Hover I tried to this template as flexible as I could, in case someone want to use it for something other than what it was created for. For instance you could conceivably use it on the main page for the boxes (as shown here), or for just about anything else. But do you think it is easy enough to use? Making an item look right is reasonably complicated. Regular wiki people will be able to get the hang of it, but people with little wiki/html/css experience might be a bit lost. What do you think. — Malice (talk) 05:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)