Talk:Monster: Difference between revisions
>KLIKS (→Act 4 monsters: classification: new section) |
>KLIKS (→Act 4 monsters: classification: new section) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 10:12, 18 June 2016
There's quite a contradiction on the main page. The Shared Stats part says that monsters have a certain amount of mana and some mana regeneration, but the part Monster Mechanics says that monsters don't have mana. Is this mana relevant only for mana steal or is it a mistake or what? --DarkUnknown (talk) 07:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Act 4 monsters: classification
I just noticed we haven't actually classified many of the act 4 monsters into types. I tried to do it myself I'm not sure about some of them. Here's how I'd classify them. At the end I listed the ones I'm not sure of. Some help would be appreciated! --Climmels aka SirProblematique (talk) 10:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Vultures
- Maelströms
- Dust Scrabblers
- Knitted Horrors
- Pocked
- Fighting Bull
- Mad Gladiator
- Fury Hounds
- Inua Totems / Totem
- Vakali Totems / Totem
- Rakango
- Gut Flayers? Flayers?
- Revenants
- Wandering Eyes
Pale Blackguard: Are these zombies or blackguards?
Voll's Fallen, Voll's Vanguard : Zombie? Or Fallen?
Pit Butcher, Pitbull Demon: I'm inclined to just call these Pitbull Demons
Rooster Demon, Talon Archer, Talon Demon: Idem, but Rooster Demons this time
Noisome Ophidian: Are these snakes?
The next three are pretty similar but still different enough to have their own monster type. We could put them under one heading too, but not sure how we'd call them. Maybe Chosen?