Talk:Gem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Iamacyborg (talk | contribs) |
Iamacyborg (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Agreed, each support gem will need to have it's own page, which details how the gem levels alongside possible best uses. Skill pages should also have a section about possible good support gems for that skill. [[User:Iamacyborg|Iamacyborg]] 17:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | :Agreed, each support gem will need to have it's own page, which details how the gem levels alongside possible best uses. Skill pages should also have a section about possible good support gems for that skill. [[User:Iamacyborg|Iamacyborg]] 17:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
==Skill Navbox== | |||
Just thinking whether or not it'd be worth creating a navbox for skills to insert in all the relevant pages, anyone have an opinion on it? My only misgivings are that it might end up being pretty huge and slightly complicated as a result. [[User:Iamacyborg|Iamacyborg]] 15:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:21, 17 June 2012
Support Gem Pages
Support Gems should have individual pages for discussion of their varied uses I think. Especially the really interesting ones like Trap and Totem. Ionface 06:40, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed, each support gem will need to have it's own page, which details how the gem levels alongside possible best uses. Skill pages should also have a section about possible good support gems for that skill. Iamacyborg 17:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Just thinking whether or not it'd be worth creating a navbox for skills to insert in all the relevant pages, anyone have an opinion on it? My only misgivings are that it might end up being pretty huge and slightly complicated as a result. Iamacyborg 15:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC)