Talk:Merveil, the Siren: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>AnnanFay (→Lore) |
>Erondites m (→Lore) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
re: Courtesans vs. Cortiers... The lore section was taken straight from the website (however I can't seem to find it there anymore), it is as it was written by GGG themselves [[User:Danny|Danny]] ([[User talk:Danny|talk]]) 22:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | re: Courtesans vs. Cortiers... The lore section was taken straight from the website (however I can't seem to find it there anymore), it is as it was written by GGG themselves [[User:Danny|Danny]] ([[User talk:Danny|talk]]) 22:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
: Would [http://www.pathofexile.com/monsters/merveil this] be of use? if you search google for "'''E'''xquisitely beautiful[.....]" you won't find it, because the '''E''' isn't real -[[User:AnnanFay|AnnanFay]] ([[User talk:AnnanFay|talk]]) 22:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | : Would [http://www.pathofexile.com/monsters/merveil this] be of use? if you search google for "'''E'''xquisitely beautiful[.....]" you won't find it, because the '''E''' isn't real -[[User:AnnanFay|AnnanFay]] ([[User talk:AnnanFay|talk]]) 22:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
That usage of courtesan has been obsolete since the 17th century. I would go with courtiers--the meaning is much more clear (and the usage is more correct), but since it's from an authoritative source I'll just add a [sic] next to it. [[User:Erondites|Erondites]] ([[User talk:Erondites|talk]]) 02:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:05, 19 February 2013
Lore
re: Courtesans vs. Cortiers... The lore section was taken straight from the website (however I can't seem to find it there anymore), it is as it was written by GGG themselves Danny (talk) 22:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Would this be of use? if you search google for "Exquisitely beautiful[.....]" you won't find it, because the E isn't real -AnnanFay (talk) 22:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
That usage of courtesan has been obsolete since the 17th century. I would go with courtiers--the meaning is much more clear (and the usage is more correct), but since it's from an authoritative source I'll just add a [sic] next to it. Erondites (talk) 02:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)